Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our workshop
    • Engineering
    • Our Team
    • Our Offices
      • Branch Offices
      • Representative Offices
    • Our partners
  • Our Technologies
    • Oilseed Extraction
    • Oil Refining
    • Dry Fractionation Plant
    • Oleochemicals
    • Biodiesel
    • Waste Oil Pre-treatment
    • Lube Oil Re-refining
  • R & D
  • Our services
  • Plants
  • Media
    • News
    • Technoilogy Talks
    • Conferences & Exhibitions
    • Insights
    • Video
  • Contact us
image
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our workshop
    • Engineering
    • Our Team
    • Our Offices
      • Branch Offices
      • Representative Offices
    • Our partners
  • Our Technologies
    • Oilseed Extraction
    • Oil Refining
    • Dry Fractionation Plant
    • Oleochemicals
    • Biodiesel
    • Waste Oil Pre-treatment
    • Lube Oil Re-refining
  • R & D
  • Our services
  • Plants
  • Media
    • News
    • Technoilogy Talks
    • Conferences & Exhibitions
    • Insights
    • Video
  • Contact us
Industrial biodiesel plant with large stainless steel storage tanks, distillation columns, and pipelines under daylight
  • 29 Settembre 2025 by Technoilogy
  • Insights, News

Feedstocks for Biodiesel Production: Waste Oils, Fats & Emerging Sources

Feedstocks for Biodiesel Production: Waste Oils, Fats & Emerging Sources

The success of biodiesel as a renewable energy solution depends heavily on its biodiesel feedstocks. While the production process—based on transesterification—remains consistent, the choice of raw materials dramatically impacts cost, efficiency, emissions, and sustainability. In today’s rapidly evolving energy landscape, feedstock flexibility is one of the main drivers shaping competitiveness and scalability in sustainable biofuels.

This article explores the range of feedstocks available for biodiesel, from conventional vegetable oils to animal fats, used cooking oil (UCO), and advanced emerging sources such as algae and lignocellulosic residues. It also examines the economic and regulatory pressures influencing feedstock selection in 2025 and beyond.

Why Feedstocks Matter in Biodiesel Production

Feedstocks represent up to 70–80% of the total production cost of biodiesel. This makes the choice of raw material a strategic decision not only for producers but also for policymakers and end users. Different feedstocks vary in terms of availability, price, energy content, and greenhouse gas (GHG) savings. Therefore, choosing the right feedstock mix is essential for achieving both profitability and sustainability goals.

Moreover, regulations such as the European Union Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) and the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) impose strict sustainability criteria, pushing producers toward waste-based and advanced feedstocks. As the biofuels industry enters 2025, diversification away from food-based oils is becoming the norm rather than the exception.

Conventional Vegetable Oils

For decades, the primary biodiesel feedstocks have been vegetable oils. These include soybean oil, rapeseed (canola) oil, sunflower oil, and palm oil. Each has unique properties influencing biodiesel quality and performance.

Soybean Oil

Soybean oil is the most common biodiesel feedstock in the United States and Brazil. It offers high oil content, reliable supply chains, and established agricultural infrastructure. However, soybean-based biodiesel typically delivers 50–60% GHG savings, less than waste-based alternatives. Land-use change also raises sustainability concerns.

Rapeseed Oil (Canola)

Rapeseed oil dominates the European biodiesel market. With favorable cold flow properties, rapeseed-based biodiesel performs better in colder climates compared to soy or palm. Yet, like soybean, it competes with food uses and raises land-use efficiency debates.

Sunflower Oil

Sunflower oil provides high-quality biodiesel but at a higher cost. It is used primarily in regions where sunflower is an abundant crop. The fuel has good oxidative stability but limited scalability due to smaller global supply.

Palm Oil

Palm oil is the cheapest vegetable oil feedstock, widely used in Asia. However, its association with deforestation and biodiversity loss makes it controversial. Under RED II, the EU is phasing out palm oil-based biodiesel by 2030.

Animal Fats

Animal fats such as tallow, lard, and poultry fat are cost-effective biodiesel feedstocks. They are by-products of the meat industry, turning waste into valuable energy. Key benefits include:

  • Lower cost than vegetable oils.
  • High energy density and favorable GHG savings (60–70%).
  • Utilization of waste streams, reducing environmental impact.

Challenges include feedstock variability, impurities, and limited supply. Proper pretreatment is required to remove free fatty acids (FFA) and contaminants before transesterification.

Used Cooking Oil (UCO)

Used cooking oil (UCO) is among the most sustainable and politically favored biodiesel feedstocks. It provides up to 85% GHG savings compared to fossil diesel, making it highly attractive under regulatory schemes such as the EU RED II and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS).

Key challenges include collection and logistics. UCO is generated in small volumes across households, restaurants, and food industries, requiring robust collection networks. Despite this, UCO-based biodiesel is scaling rapidly in Europe and Asia.

Emerging Feedstocks

As demand for sustainable biodiesel feedstocks grows, attention is shifting to advanced options that do not compete with food supply.

Algae

Algae-based biofuels have long been viewed as a promising solution due to their high oil yield per hectare, rapid growth, and ability to thrive on non-arable land. Algae also absorb CO₂, contributing to negative emissions. However, commercial-scale production remains limited due to high costs and technological hurdles in harvesting and oil extraction.

Lignocellulosic Residues

Lignocellulosic feedstocks such as crop residues, forestry waste, and municipal solid waste represent another frontier. These materials are abundant, cheap, and sustainable. Technologies such as pyrolysis and gasification could convert these residues into biodiesel precursors, though large-scale deployment is still in development.

Industrial By-Products

By-products such as tall oil from the pulp and paper industry and fatty acid distillates from refining processes are gaining traction. These sources improve circularity and reduce reliance on virgin feedstocks.

Comparative Analysis of Feedstocks

Feedstock Cost GHG Savings Scalability Challenges
Soybean Oil Moderate 50–60% High Land-use, food competition
Rapeseed Oil High 55–65% Moderate Cost, food competition
Palm Oil Low 40–50% High Deforestation concerns
Animal Fats Low 60–70% Moderate Impurities, limited supply
Used Cooking Oil Low–Moderate 80–85% Growing Collection logistics
Algae High 90%+ Low (pilot stage) Costs, harvesting technology

Regulatory and Market Dynamics

Feedstock selection is not just a technical choice; it is shaped by policy, subsidies, and consumer demand. The EU’s RED II sets stricter limits on crop-based biofuels, while offering incentives for waste-based and advanced feedstocks. In the U.S., the RFS and LCFS create financial advantages for low-carbon feedstocks such as UCO and animal fats.

By 2025, producers must adapt to tighter sustainability criteria, traceability requirements, and growing pressure from consumers demanding transparency in the fuel supply chain.

Conclusion

The evolution of biodiesel feedstocks reflects the industry’s broader transition toward sustainability and efficiency. From conventional vegetable oils to waste-based and advanced options, the feedstock landscape is diversifying rapidly. The future of biodiesel lies in balancing cost, sustainability, and scalability through innovative feedstock strategies.

For a full overview of the biodiesel production process, technologies, and market outlook, see our detailed Pillar on Biodiesel Production.

Want to explore the complete biodiesel production journey, from feedstocks to refining and market outlook?

Read the Full Biodiesel Production Pillar

Insights, News

Navigazione articoli

prev article
next article
Categorie
  • Conferences & Exhibitions
  • Insights
  • News
  • Technoilogy Talks

Who we are

TECHNOILOGY, a story of over 65 years of excellence and expertise. TECHNOILOGY is an international engineering company specialized in the design and manufacturing of plants for Edible Oils, Oleochemicals and Biodiesel production.
get in touch
Logo
  • China
  • Canada
  • Russia
  • Germany

Our News

  • Night-time edible oil bleaching facility with illuminated stainless steel tanks and filtration systems

    Bleaching in Edible Oil Refining: Clays, Process Optimization & Quality Standards Edible oil bleaching is a critical stage in the refining of edible oils, designed to remove unwanted pigments, polar impurities, and trace contaminants that compromise the quality, stability, and commercial value of the final product. In an increasingly demanding market, bleaching is not just a cosmetic treatment to improve oil color, but an advanced technology that directly affects shelf life, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance. History and Evolution of Bleaching The bleaching of vegetable oils dates back to the 19th century, when natural clays were used to clarify oils intended for food use. With the growth of the food industry and the introduction of international purity standards, bleaching evolved from an empirical practice into a sophisticated engineering process. In the 1970s–80s, the introduction of acid-activated bleaching clays dramatically improved the removal of phospholipids, pigments, and metals, enabling industrial refining to achieve unprecedented quality levels. Today, bleaching is no longer seen as an isolated step, but as part of an integrated ecosystem that includes degumming, neutralization, deodorization, and fractionation. Its design directly impacts the performance of downstream steps and the overall cost of production. Impurities and Pigments to Be Removed Crude oils contain a complex mixture of compounds that negatively affect quality and stability. During edible oil bleaching, the main targets include: Carotenoids (β-carotene, xanthophylls, lutein): responsible for yellow-orange hues. Chlorophylls: green pigments that accelerate photo-oxidation, especially under light exposure. Oxidation products: aldehydes, ketones, and hydroperoxides that cause off-flavors and early rancidity. Trace metals (iron, copper, nickel): catalysts of oxidative degradation. Soaps and residual phospholipids: if not fully removed in degumming, they compromise stability and filterability. Polycyclic aromatic compounds and pesticides: contaminants to be reduced for regulatory compliance. Removing these compounds improves color, stability, and safety, enabling higher-quality oils that meet global standards. Bleaching Clays and Adsorbents The heart of edible oil bleaching lies in the adsorbents. The choice of material directly affects efficiency, costs, and environmental impact. Bleaching Earth Natural clays based on montmorillonite were the first materials used. After acid and thermal treatments, they become highly porous and able to retain pigments, metals, and polar residues. They remain the industrial standard today. Activated Clays Through acid activation, clay surface area can increase from 100 m²/g to over 300 m²/g. This higher porosity makes them especially effective in removing chlorophylls and heavy metals. However, production requires acid consumption and effluent management. Activated Carbons Activated carbons are used for specific applications, such as removing pesticides and unwanted aromatic compounds. They are often combined with bleaching earths to maximize efficiency on challenging oils. Hybrid and Innovative Adsorbents Recently, hybrid adsorbents have been introduced, combining activated clays and carbons, or functionalized with metal oxides. These reduce total clay consumption (by 20–30%) and improve process stability. Operational Bleaching Process Edible oil bleaching follows a standardized sequence that includes preparation, contact with adsorbent, and filtration: 1. Preparation The oil is heated to 90–110°C and placed under vacuum (<5 mbar). This removes oxygen and water, reducing oxidative reactions during bleaching. 2. Dosing and Mixing The adsorbent is typically added in doses of 0.5–2% of oil weight. The exact dosage depends on oil type (soybean, palm, sunflower, rapeseed, peanut, corn) and the required quality specifications. Mixing occurs under constant agitation for 20–30 minutes. 3. Filtration Spent bleaching earth is separated using filter presses or leaf filters. The filter cake can trap up to 20% of oil, reducing yield. To minimize loss, pre-coating techniques and advanced filtration systems are used. Critical Bleaching Parameters Successful bleaching depends on precise operating parameters: Temperature: 95–105°C is optimal. Too high causes degradation, too low reduces efficiency. Vacuum: essential to prevent oxidation; typically <5 mbar. Contact time: 20–30 minutes. Too short reduces decolorization, too long risks degradation. Clay dosage: standard range is 0.8–1.5%, but may reach 2% for highly pigmented oils such as palm or corn. Case Studies: Different Oils, Different Approaches Bleaching efficiency varies significantly depending on oil type: Soybean oil: requires moderate bleaching (0.8–1.2%) to remove chlorophylls and carotenoids. Palm oil: highly pigmented; clay doses up to 2% are necessary. Sunflower oil: rich in waxes and chlorophylls, requires combinations of clays and carbons. Rapeseed oil: contains polar impurities; benefits from special bleaching. Peanut oil: less pigmented, requires lower dosages. These cases show how optimization must be tailored to feedstock and market specifications. Spent Earth Management and By-Products Spent bleaching earth can account for up to 3% of total throughput. Managing it is both an economic and environmental challenge: Regeneration: thermal processes enable partial reuse. Oil recovery: up to 20% of entrapped oil can be recovered with dedicated presses. Disposal: use in cement plants as alternative fuel. The future lies in drastically reducing clay consumption via regenerable adsorbents and digitally optimized dosing systems. Quality Standards and Regulations Edible oil bleaching must comply with international standards: Codex Alimentarius: limits on color, residues, and metals. EN/ISO: European parameters for refined oils. FDA (USA): requirements for food use and HACCP compliance. Bleaching quality is measured through parameters such as Lovibond color, phosphorus content, oxidative stability (Rancimat), residual metals, and polar contaminants. Environmental Impact and LCA The environmental footprint of bleaching relates to clay consumption, spent earth generation, and energy use. LCA studies show that adopting continuous processes and regenerable adsorbents can reduce environmental impact by up to 30%. Transitioning to low-energy systems is now a top priority for producers and technology providers. Technological Innovations Innovation directions in edible oil bleaching include: Regenerable adsorbents with extended lifespans. Continuous bleaching systems with automated dosing. Digital automation with in-line sensors to monitor color and contaminants. Technoilogy solutions integrating bleaching with degumming and neutralization in a single engineering design. Conclusion Edible oil bleaching is a key step in ensuring the quality, stability, and safety of edible oils. From natural clays to hybrid adsorbents, from batch methods to continuous systems, bleaching has undergone a long evolution, today becoming a driver of competitiveness and sustainability. To explore the role of bleaching within the full refining journey, from degumming to Read more

    Read more
  • Biodiesel purification and glycerine distillation facility with stainless steel tanks and columns under daylight

    Biodiesel Purification & Glycerine Distillation: From By-Product to Value Chain Biodiesel production does not end with transesterification: to meet international standards (EN 14214, ASTM D6751) and ensure reliable engine performance, the fuel must undergo a careful stage of biodiesel purification. In parallel, glycerine distillation transforms a by-product – crude glycerol – into a valuable resource for pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, and fine chemical industries. This article provides an in-depth analysis of typical impurities in crude biodiesel, the most common purification techniques (water washing, dry washing, membrane separation), strategies for glycerine distillation, and opportunities for value creation across the supply chain. Why Biodiesel Purification is Essential Insufficiently purified biodiesel carries technical risks (filter clogging, corrosion, deposits), economic risks (reprocessing, product recalls), and regulatory risks (non-compliance). The goals of biodiesel purification are: Remove residual catalysts (NaOH/KOH or acids), soaps, and salts. Eliminate free glycerol and unreacted monoglycerides/diglycerides. Separate methanol and water to comply with flash point and stability limits. Reduce traces of metals and suspended solid contaminants. Stabilize biodiesel against oxidation and cold flow issues (with additives if needed). The expected outcome is a FAME product compliant with standards, with key parameters such as total/free glycerol, acid value, water content, total contamination, and oxidative stability within the required ranges. Typical Impurities in Crude Biodiesel The feedstock and process design strongly influence impurity profiles. After transesterification and glycerine phase separation, crude FAME typically contains: Residual alcohol (mainly methanol): lowers flash point, increases volatility and safety risks. Catalysts and soaps: soaps form from base reaction with FFA; cause emulsions and phase losses. Free glycerol and mono/diglycerides: impair filterability and cause deposits. Water: promotes hydrolysis, free fatty acid formation, and corrosion. Solid matter in suspension: residual filter aids, adsorbents, dust, particulates. Trace metals (Na, K, Ca, Mg) and phosphorus: affect emissions, downstream catalysts, and compliance. Biodiesel Purification Techniques There is no universal purification method: the choice depends on feedstock, catalyst type, target quality, CAPEX/OPEX balance, and available utilities. The three main families are water washing, dry washing, and membrane separation; hybrid sequences are often adopted to maximize both yield and quality. Water Washing The most traditional and widespread method. Crude FAME is contacted with water (often warm) to extract soluble catalysts, soaps, methanol, and glycerol. It can be applied as mist wash (light spraying/agitation) or bubble wash (sparging). Typical steps include: First wash to remove most soaps and methanol. Second/third washes for polishing (until conductivity/transparency targets are met). Water/FAME separation and drying (stripping, vacuum, hot air) to reduce water to compliant levels. Pros: simple, basic equipment, efficient on hydrophilic species. Cons: high water use, effluent generation (requires treatment), risk of emulsions and FAME losses if soap levels are high. Best practice: light acid wash (citric/phosphoric) to “break” soaps before water wash, reducing emulsions. Dry Washing A “dry” alternative based on adsorbents (ion exchange resins, magnesium silicate, activated clays). FAME flows through columns/filters where impurities are retained. Can be single-pass or multi-stage with mixed media. Pros: no wastewater, compact layout, more stable continuous processes, fewer emulsions. Cons: adsorbent cost and management, robust filtration needed, risk of channeling and media saturation. Often followed by a polishing stage (fine filters, coalescers) and methanol recovery/stripping. Membrane Separation Membrane technologies (micro/ultra/nanofiltration) separate species by size/charge. In biodiesel purification they are used to reduce free glycerol, soaps, water, and solids. They can reduce the use of water and adsorbents but require careful fouling control and effective CIP cleaning systems. Hybrid Sequences and Optimization Many plants adopt hybrid trains such as: acid crack → minimal water wash → dry polish → methanol stripping. Optimization levers include: Upstream FFA control (pretreatment) to limit soap formation. Adsorbent dose/contact time and filter bed quality. Methanol management (energy-efficient recovery, recycle into reaction). Vacuum drying at low temperature to preserve stability. Critical Quality Parameters (Post-Purification) To declare the product compliant, QC laboratories monitor key indicators after biodiesel purification: Total and free glycerol (EN/ASTM limits). Monoglycerides/diglycerides (indicative of incomplete conversion). Acid value (residual FFA) and iodine number. Water content and sediments/particulates. Metals (Na, K, Ca, Mg), phosphorus, sulfur. Oxidative stability (Rancimat) and cloud point/CFPP. Methanol Management and Safety Residual methanol must be reduced below regulatory thresholds for flash point and safety. Strategies include stripping (steam/inert gas), recycle columns, and recovery for reuse in transesterification. ATEX systems, vapor detection, and ventilation procedures are integral to process engineering. Glycerine: By-Product or Opportunity? The heavy phase of transesterification contains glycerine (glycerol), methanol, soaps, and impurities. Value is created through neutralization, clarification, concentration, and finally glycerine distillation to obtain technical, USP/Ph.Eur., and food/cosmetic grades. Purified glycerine is used as: Humectant and solvent in cosmetics and personal care. Food additive (E422) and pharmaceutical excipient. Intermediate for propylene glycol, resins, and plasticizers. Typical Glycerine Processing Line Neutralization: remove catalyst, convert soaps to FFA (then separated). Separation/clarification of salts and coarse impurities (decanting, centrifugation). Evaporation: remove methanol and water (recover methanol). Bleaching/filtration (if required) to improve color. Vacuum distillation (often multi-effect, thin-film, or molecular distillation) to achieve purities >99.5%. Plant design balances target purity, energy use, fouling risks, and thermal stability. Thin-film configurations reduce thermal degradation and improve product quality. Glycerine Grades and Specifications Crude glycerine (60–85%): destined for further processing or low-value technical uses. Technical grade (≥95%): for paints, resins, antifreeze, lubricants. USP/Ph.Eur./Food grade (≥99.5%): cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, food. Correct glycerine distillation is decisive for accessing premium markets. Markets and Applications of Purified Glycerine Demand for high-quality glycerine is growing in cosmetics, sanitizers, pharmaceuticals, and food. Trends include: Personal care formulations requiring safe, natural humectants. Production of bio-based propylene glycol as a green substitute. Use in alkyd resins, plasticizers, and eco-friendly lubricants. Comparative Overview: FAME Purification Techniques Technique Pros Cons Best Fit Water washing Simple, effective on hydrophilic species Water use, effluents, risk of emulsions Small/medium plants, limited CAPEX Dry washing No wastewater, continuous, stable Adsorbent cost, filter/column management Medium/large plants, steady demand Membranes Low water/adsorbent use Fouling, higher CAPEX, CIP management When OPEX/environmental performance is priority Integration, Sustainability & Energy Purification affects both energy and water use. Best practices to reduce footprint include: Heat Read more

    Read more
  • Industrial edible oil degumming plant with stainless steel tanks, centrifuges, and pipelines under daylight

    Degumming in Edible Oil Refining: Processes, Challenges & Modern Solutions The first crucial step in edible oil refining is degumming, the removal of phospholipids and other impurities that affect stability, color, flavor, and shelf life. Edible oil degumming is not just a technical requirement; it is a turning point that impacts the entire refining chain, from neutralization to deodorization. Without effective degumming, subsequent processes become more expensive and less efficient, and the oil risks failing to meet international quality standards. Why Degumming is Essential Phospholipids (or gums) are polar compounds present in vegetable oils. They can account for 0.5% to 3% of crude oil, depending on the feedstock (soybean, sunflower, rapeseed, palm, corn). If not removed, they cause significant issues: Oxidative instability: accelerate rancidity and color deterioration. Operational problems: foaming, deposits, and fouling in heat exchangers. Reduced yield: presence of phosphorus, metals, and waxes that hinder neutralization and bleaching. Regulatory non-compliance: strict limits on phosphorus (<10 ppm) and heavy metals. Degumming transforms unstable crude oil into a feedstock ready for subsequent steps. It also generates lecithin, a high-value by-product used in food, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical industries. Chemistry of Phospholipids and Impurities The main phospholipids found in oils are phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, and phosphatidylserine. Their polar nature makes them insoluble in refined oils and prone to forming stable emulsions with water and alcohols. Alongside phospholipids, other contaminants are present in crude oil: Metals (iron, copper): catalyze oxidation. Pigments: chlorophyll, carotenoids. Protein and sugar residues. Waxes and sterols (particularly in sunflower and corn oils). These impurities affect stability, taste, and color, and reduce the efficiency of bleaching and deodorization. A well-designed edible oil degumming strategy is essential to reduce contaminants to manageable levels. Traditional Degumming Techniques The two most established techniques are water degumming and acid degumming, both used for decades in the edible oil industry. Water Degumming Water degumming involves adding 2–3% hot water (70–80°C) to crude oil. The water hydrates hydratable phospholipids (HPL), making them insoluble and easily separable via centrifugation. The process is simple and economical but leaves behind non-hydratable phospholipids (NHP) that require further treatment. Pros: simple, low cost, produces edible lecithin. Cons: ineffective on NHP; generates emulsions and wastewater. Acid Degumming Acid degumming uses organic acids (citric, phosphoric) to convert non-hydratable phospholipids into hydratable forms. A subsequent water wash removes these gums. It is more effective than water degumming alone and reduces phosphorus levels to <50 ppm. Pros: removes both HPL and NHP, suitable for multiple oils. Cons: requires downstream neutralization; higher water and reagent consumption. Advanced Degumming Techniques Over the last two decades, research has led to special degumming and enzymatic methods. These address the need for stricter oil specifications and reduced environmental costs. Enzymatic Degumming Enzymatic degumming employs phospholipases, enzymes that hydrolyze phospholipids into diglycerides and free fatty acids. These products remain in the oil, increasing yield and reducing waste. Main advantages include: Phosphorus reduction to <5 ppm. Higher yield (less oil loss in gums). Lower water and reagent consumption. Cons: higher CAPEX and OPEX, enzyme sensitivity to temperature and pH, need for specialized know-how. Special Degumming (Superdegumming, TOP Degumming) Processes such as superdegumming and TOP degumming combine acids, enzymes, and optimized operating conditions to reduce phosphorus to below 10 ppm, a requirement for physical refining. These technologies are crucial for oils destined for margarine, shortenings, and other sensitive applications. Critical Parameters and Optimization The success of edible oil degumming depends on precise control of process parameters: Temperature: typically 70–90°C; too high degrades oil, too low slows the reaction. pH: critical for both enzymatic activity and proper acidification. Contact time: must be sufficient to hydrate or hydrolyze phospholipids. Reagent dosage: excess acid leads to emulsions and reduced yield. Centrifugation efficiency: key to gum separation. Modern degumming lines incorporate in-line monitoring systems (NIR, FTIR) to track phosphorus levels and optimize the process in real time. By-Products and Market Opportunities Degumming produces lecithin, a mixture of phospholipids with multiple applications: Emulsifier in chocolate, margarine, baked goods. Nutraceutical supplement (phosphatidylcholine for liver and cognitive support). Ingredient in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Lecithin valorization improves both the economic and ecological sustainability of refining. In integrated plants, lecithin can represent up to 5% of production value. Operational Challenges and Troubleshooting Degumming presents technical challenges that require operational expertise: Emulsion formation: manage agitation, acid crack, and centrifuge design. High phosphorus residues: optimize acidification or add enzymatic stages. Yield losses: improve centrifuge design and dosing controls. Enzyme instability: control temperature, pH, and contamination. Innovations 2025 and Future Trends The main innovation trends in edible oil degumming include: Development of more stable enzymes for wider operating ranges. Integration of digital monitoring and predictive automation. Low-energy techniques (membranes, hybrid processes). Improved circularity through by-product valorization. These trends address global challenges such as energy costs, sustainability, and the demand for purer, more stable oils. Conclusion Edible oil degumming is a decisive step in the refining of vegetable oils. The removal of phospholipids and impurities stabilizes the oil, improves quality, and reduces downstream costs. From traditional to enzymatic and special techniques, today’s solutions provide flexibility and competitiveness. The challenge for producers is selecting the optimal mix of technologies depending on feedstock, markets, and sustainability goals. To explore the full refining journey, from degumming to bleaching and advanced purification, read the complete guide: Refining Edible Oils and Fats: Processes & Technologies 2025. Want to learn the full refining journey, from degumming to advanced purification? Read the complete guide to edible oil refining

    Read more

Contacts

TECHNOILOGY S.r.l.

OPERATIVE: Via D. Federici, 12/14 04012 Cisterna di Latina (LT) – Italy 

Tel./Fax: +39 06 9696181
Mail: [email protected]

A story of over 70 years of excellence and expertise.

TECHNOILOGY is an international engineering company specialized in the design and manufacturing of plants for Edible Oils, Oleochemicals and Biodiesel production.

LEGAL: Viale F. T. Marinetti, 221 00143 Roma – Italy P.IVA IT13633591006 © ; 2022 Technoilogy. All rights reserved.
Gestisci Consenso Cookie
Per fornire le migliori esperienze, utilizziamo tecnologie come i cookie per memorizzare e/o accedere alle informazioni del dispositivo. Il consenso a queste tecnologie ci permetterà di elaborare dati come il comportamento di navigazione o ID unici su questo sito. Non acconsentire o ritirare il consenso può influire negativamente su alcune caratteristiche e funzioni.
Funzionale
Sempre attivo
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono strettamente necessari al fine legittimo di consentire l'uso di un servizio specifico esplicitamente richiesto dall'abbonato o dall'utente, o al solo scopo di effettuare la trasmissione di una comunicazione su una rete di comunicazione elettronica.
Preferenze
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono necessari per lo scopo legittimo di memorizzare le preferenze che non sono richieste dall'abbonato o dall'utente.
Statistiche
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso che viene utilizzato esclusivamente per scopi statistici. L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso che viene utilizzato esclusivamente per scopi statistici anonimi. Senza un mandato di comparizione, una conformità volontaria da parte del vostro Fornitore di Servizi Internet, o ulteriori registrazioni da parte di terzi, le informazioni memorizzate o recuperate per questo scopo da sole non possono di solito essere utilizzate per l'identificazione.
Marketing
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono necessari per creare profili di utenti per inviare pubblicità, o per tracciare l'utente su un sito web o su diversi siti web per scopi di marketing simili.
Gestisci opzioni Gestisci servizi Gestisci fornitori Per saperne di più su questi scopi
Visualizza le preferenze
{title} {title} {title}